Background Image
Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  15 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 15 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

difficult to provide a choice of pipeline providers

to product owners. As some consider this scenario

to be monopolistic, there is a desire to ensure that

the operators of fee-based pipelines feel the need to

continuously improve the effectiveness and efficiency

of their organisation and provide best-value to their

customers. To encourage this, fees are often regulated.

In assessing fees, regulators will seek to ensure a fair

price is paid by both shippers and by final consumers,

while providing opportunity for the most progressive

pipeline owners. Pipeline performance can impact

fee-based decisions, including the manner in which

operating expenditures (OPEX) are reduced, even if

that necessitates additional upfront capital investment

(CAPEX). At the other end of the scale, fees may be

set at a level that forces a less efficient operator to drive

cost out of its business, if it is to remain viable.

Long-term Investment Means

Above-and-Beyond Maintenance

Service companies, in particular, help infrastructure

investment companies qualify and quantify risk

to their pipeline assets through inline inspections

and non-destructive evaluation. In fact, they often

establish partnerships to complement an infrastructure

investment company’s long-term investment strategy.

One example of this risk-based approach is Nord

Stream AG, a consortium of five shareholders that

owns two offshore gas pipelines that operate through

the Baltic Sea from Russia to Germany. “Nord

Stream’s operating life is 50 years,” says Jean-François

Plaziat, the company’s Deputy Technical Director

of Operational Maintenance and Engineering. “To

achieve that amount of time, our company has

developed a long-term pipeline integrity management

strategy. Regular pipeline inspections and maintenance

works are essential parts of the plan, including annual

maintenance of mechanical components and testing of

the automation system.”

Inspections and testing allow the company to

quantify the risk – and consequences – of potential

damage and accidents. And if the potential

consequences are too high, then they will spend the

requisite funds to prevent them. For example, at

Nord Stream, “the main risk of damage is related to

third-party impact such as sinking ships,” says Plaziat.

Therefore, “the pipeline is continuously monitored by

a leak detection system,” ensuring quick emergency

response if needed.

An Investment in Improvement

Perhaps the most important difference of operating

a pipeline as a long-term investment is that the

managing company is likely to pursue integrity

assessments and make improvements beyond

those required by safety inspectors. Infrastructure

investment companies need to completely understand

the condition of their pipeline through testing and

inspections – and they need trusted partners to help

them identify improvements that can enhance the

versatility, safety, and efficiency of their investment for

years to come.

13

I N N O V AT I O N S • V O L . V I I , N O. 1 • 2 0 1 5

When it comes to finding ways to decrease OPEX, most

infrastructure investment companies look to engineers,

service companies, and other operators for guidance.

For example, one way to decrease OPEX is to make the

pipeline more efficient. An efficient pipeline system

requires less time and money to operate. This means

that infrastructure investment companies are especially

open-minded if suggested improvements – like tie-ins or

refurbishments – increase the efficiency and versatility of

the pipeline and allow them to reduce OPEX. “More than

ever before, if a pipeline engineer has a sound rationale

to justify an approach, this rationale is given proper

consideration,” explains Bill Rees, General Manager for T.D.

Williamson, Central Europe. “These companies are looking

out for their shareholders, so if they can spend money now

to ensure long-term stable returns, they will.”

CAPEX

OPEX

• Equipment and pipeline inspection,

maintenance and repairs

• Insurance

• Labour

• Consumables

• EPRS and emergency contingency

• Legal

• Local taxes

• Flaring and gas shrinkage (lost gas)

• Buildings and utilities

• Depreciation

• Right of Way

• Construction

• Linepipe

• Cleaning/Scraping facilities

• SCADA

$

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

$ $ $ $

What Does It Mean

For Operators?

OPEX

vs.

CAPEX

[operating expenditures]

[capital expenditures]